.

Kawasaki Z 1000ST

.  

Make Model

Kawasaki Z 1000ST

Year

1979

Engine

Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 2 Valve per cylinder

Capacity

1015 cc / 61.9 cu-in
Bore x Stroke 69.4 х 66 mm
Cooling System Air cooled
Compression Ratio 8.7:1
Lubrication Wet sump

Induction

4x 28mm Mikuni carburetors

Ignition 

Battery powered capacitor
Starting Electric

Max Power

93 hp / 69.3 kW @ 8000 rpm

Max Torque

9.1 kgf-m / 58.5 lb-ft @ 6500 rpm

Transmission 

5 Speed 
Final Drive Shaft

Front Suspension

Oil telescopic forks

Rear Suspension

Swinging arm oil damper 5-way spring preload

Front Brakes

2x 240mm discs 1 piston caliper

Rear Brakes

Single 250mm disc 2 piston caliper

Front Tyre

3.50-19

Rear Tyre

4.50-17
Wheelbase 1575 mm / 62 in
Seat Height 813 mm / 32 in

Dry Weight

225 kg / 496 lbs

Fuel Capacity 

18 Litres / 4.7 US gal

Consumption Average

36 mpg

Standing ¼ Mile  

12.4 sec / 10.3 mp/h

Top Speed

217 km/h / 135 mph

Road Test

Cycle 1979
.  

The Bike magazine 1980

 

Julian Ryder reckons that Kawasaki's Z1000ST touring shaft is the snip of the year
hen I was drawing up some guidelines on what makes a good touring bike for last month's Tour de Force feature I omitted one obvious factor. As the bikes in question were both equipped with shaft drive it was taken as read that a high-performance motorcycle intended primarily for touring should be shaft driven.

 

The extra weight of the shaft compared to a chain and the small power loss produced in the drive train don't matter to the serious touring rider. So, what better idea than to take an engine established as almost bulletproof and revamp its cycle parts to suit, then add shaft drive.
Kawasaki did just that with the Z1000 and come up with the Z1000ST. The power plant is just the same as a Mkll but the rest is different, albeit in a rather subtle way.


The front fork stanchions are 40mm tubes as compared to the Mkll s 36 and they are leading axle. The ST has more travel and is noticeably softer at the front end than other Kawasaki 1 000s. Rear suspension is also different with softer springs and improved damping. It's a combination that gives a very comfortable ride but doesn't encourage scratching.
The frame has come in for attention as well. The steering
head is braced by plates behind the downtubes and a cast iron plate beefs things up between the swinging arm pivots. The airbox is 2 Litres bigger than on other models, which means that inlet noise is cut and also means that sidepanels and frame geometry in that area are different again from a Mkll.


Apart from the final drive, other distinguishing points are the lower silencers and 1 7 inch rear tyre on the ST. Kawasaki say the silencers are routed that way to leave plenty of room for touring bags or panniers.


And does the shaft affect the bike's behaviour in any way? The answer is no. On the first couple of occasions I rode it I was aware of the rear end rising as I pulled away, but once I'd got a few hundred miles under the ST's wheels it felt like I was on a bike with slightly slack chain final drive.


There is a penalty to be paid for the convenience of shaft drive. First there is weight; the ST coming in at 20 pounds heavier than the Z1000H fuel injector. Secondly there's performance. A top speed of just over 1 20mph at MIRA is 5mph down on the H but more significantly the standing V* mile time of 1 2.62 was over half a second down on the fuel injector.


On the road though the now classic engine — it's been with us for nine years — deals out seemingly endless supplies of power. It doesn't mind what gear it's in or where the tacho needle is, just wind it on and travel. Mind you it's still a Z1, and has to be treated with a fair amount of respect. Getting a little too enthusiastic in the wet is just asking for the rear tyre to break traction. The ST is most definitely a big hairy-chested motorcycle. Don't mess with it.
Another factor that the touring rider will take into account when looking for a bike is fuel consumption.

 

I got an average of 44mpg but this figure hides two extremes. One tankful was used up around town at a rate of 30mpg. A full bore slog down the M1 gave 36mpg and a gentle trip two-up with luggage from Rouen up the Seine Valley towards Paris saw figures of nearly 60mpg being returned.


A fuel gauge is sited in the face of the tacho but like most of these things currently being fitted it tends to induce paranoia rather than inform the rider of the state of affairs in the tank. The needle hits the empty mark after 100 to 125 miles, well before the rider needs to switch to reserve. It's the sort of thing that's impossible to ignore and retain any peace of mind, so fuel stops are an all too regular occurence.


Really this is a small moan compared to the overall excellence of the bike as a tourer. The only thing that really niggled me, or rather it niggled my passenger, was the lack of a grab rail. That and the vibration period that blurred the mirrors and shook the rests.
To compensate for those discomforts the seat was excellent. . Neither rider nor passenger had any complaints.


Any time now the 1981 Kawasakis will be in the dealers and this means that the ST's replacement, the Z1100A, will be with us. So what's happening to the STs already in stock? They're being discounted something fierce, that's what.
I've been having a quick flip through the weekly comics and in one issue for early December spotted two quite large dealerships offering STs for under £1 700. And that's an on the road price. When you consider that the list price is £2199 it doesn't take a lot of brain to recognise a bargain.