|
Classic Bikes
Custom Bikes
Individual
Racing Bikes AJP
AJS
Aprilia
Ariel
Avinton / Wakan
Bajaj
Benelli
Beta
Bimota
BMW
Brough Superior
BRP Cam-Am
BSA
Buell / EBR
Bultaco
Cagiva
Campagna
CCM
CF Moto
Combat Motors
Derbi
Deus
Ducati
Excelsior
GASGAS
Ghezzi Brian
Gilera
GIMA
Harley Davidson
Hero
Highland
Honda
Horex
Husaberg
Husqvarna
Hyosung
Indian
Jawa
Kawasaki
KTM
KYMCO
Laverda
Lazareth
Magni
Maico
Mash
Matchless
Mondial
Moto Guzzi
Moto Morini
MV Agusta
MZ / MuZ
NCR
Norton
NSU
Paton
Peugeot
Piaggio
Revival Cycles
Roland Sands
Royal Enfield
Sachs
Sherco
Sunbeam
Suzuki
SWM
SYM
Triumph
TVS
Ural
Velocette
Vespa
Victory
Vincent
VOR
Voxan
Vyrus
Walt Siegl
Walz
Wrenchmonkees
Wunderlich
XTR / Radical
Yamaha
Zero
Video
Technical
Complete Manufacturer List
|
Honda CD 175
Before leaving Motorcycle Sport magazine to become a freelance tester of high-speed motor cycles, David Minton had already acquired a certain reputation for his way with a bike. He would take some proud scion of a pedigree line — usually British, usually a vertical twin — ride it in his inimitable fashion, and very soon wreck it. Not always totally: sometimes the damage would be nothing more than a fractured mudguard, seat fixing or headlamp support. But often a valve would fall in, a gasket would blow, a pushrod bend. He believed in revs: and British bikes of the 1960s, designwise already a little long in the tooth, were not up to that sort of life. When he was reduced to a Honda, having disposed of all available 500s, it was expected that he would be reporting back, probably almost concurrently with his departure, with grave news. He was riding the 175 Honda of 1967, which made extensive use of pressed steel for the box spine of the frame and other cycle parts, including even the rear pivoted fork. Where he had been accustomed to fault the expensive tubular frame of high-performance British machines, he was happy to report that the Honda layout was pleasingly rigid. Instead of waiting for cracks to appear (as invariably happened with the all-metal mudguards of Triumph or BSA, Norton or Matchless), he could only marvel at the durability of the plastic guards fitted to the 175. Vibration, he said of the 180° crankshaft engine, was 'non-existent except for a couple of periods of "humming" through wind; on his return, he was reduced to the handlebar'. Praise indeed. about 70mph). He informed readers that the 'little claimed to be a sports bike, machine cruised flat out most of the time without faltering', and then, in a revealing aside, mused on the possibility of Honda achieving similar results should they turn their hand to a pushrod-operated vertical twin with a 360° crankshaft. A 100-mile journey from London to Norwich was covered at a steady 75 to 80mph (with the wind; on his return, he was reduced to about 70mph). This on a 175 that was not claimed to be a sports bike.
|
|
Any corrections or more information on these motorcycles will be kindly appreciated. |