|
Classic Bikes
Custom Bikes
Individual
Racing Bikes AJP
AJS
Aprilia
Ariel
Avinton / Wakan
Bajaj
Benelli
Beta
Bimota
BMW
Brough Superior
BRP Cam-Am
BSA
Buell / EBR
Bultaco
Cagiva
Campagna
CCM
CF Moto
Combat Motors
Derbi
Deus
Ducati
Excelsior
GASGAS
Ghezzi Brian
Gilera
GIMA
Harley Davidson
Hero
Highland
Honda
Horex
Husaberg
Husqvarna
Hyosung
Indian
Jawa
Kawasaki
KTM
KYMCO
Laverda
Lazareth
Magni
Maico
Mash
Matchless
Mondial
Moto Guzzi
Moto Morini
MV Agusta
MZ / MuZ
NCR
Norton
NSU
Paton
Peugeot
Piaggio
Revival Cycles
Roland Sands
Royal Enfield
Sachs
Sherco
Sunbeam
Suzuki
SWM
SYM
Triumph
TVS
Ural
Velocette
Vespa
Victory
Vincent
VOR
Voxan
Vyrus
Walt Siegl
Walz
Wrenchmonkees
Wunderlich
XTR / Radical
Yamaha
Zero
Video
Technical
Complete Manufacturer List
|
Sunbeam S7 500
WHEN THE 1946 SUNBEAM S7 was unveiled to the post-war biking public, it was one of the most technically advanced motorcycles of its age. With its all-aluminium, "unit-construction", single overhead-camshaft, horizontally split engine, it also boasted shaft drive, a smooth power delivery and numerous other technical refinements that ensured it was going to be a massive hit. Or so felt BSA which had acquired Sunbeam in 1943. In fact, the bike turned out to be something of a sales flop and was (arguably) one of the most woefully under-supported acts in the history of British motorcycling. It could have been great. But instead, it was merely adequate. Other problems with the S7 prototypes included stripping of the underslung worm gear final-drive—that in turn is said to have led to swingeing cuts in engine power, the concomitant of which was a fairly mediocre (and struggling) 75-mph performer in an age when riders were pushing hard for the magic ton. However, according to David Holyoake of Sunbeam specialist Stewart Engineering, there was never anything wrong with the worm final drive which, over five decades, has proved to be very reliable in service and maintenance light; a claim borne out by the direct testimony of many other Sunbeam S7 and S8 owners who have had no trouble whatsoever in tens of thousand of miles. However, the correct AG140 oil is crucial. Meanwhile, oil capacity for the wet-sump engine was, at just three pints, always marginal leading to overheating with the very real risk of engine casting distortion and/or seizure (an aftermarket extended oil sump is available from Stewarts and is advised). But the handling, with its one-way damped telescopic front fork (no damping on early models), plunger rear suspension and 16-inch balloon tyres, left much to be desired. And words such as ‘wallow’ and ‘weave’ were, with some justification, quickly associated with the mount. Meanwhile, the 8-inch single leading shoe brakes, although not bad for the performance, would never be described as particularly impressive. Moreover, a bulky machine like this was always likely to find both an ally, and an enemy, in ordinary wind resistance.
|
|
Any corrections or more information on these motorcycles will be kindly appreciated. |