.

Ducati 851 SP2

.  

Make Model

Ducati 851 SP2

Year

1990

Engine

Four stroke, 90°“L”twin cylinder, DOHC, desmodromic 4 valves per cylinder, belt driven

Capacity

888 cc / 54.2 cu in
Bore x Stroke 92 x 64 mm
Compression Ratio 10.7:1
Cooling System Liquid cooled

Induction

Weber I.A.W. CPU P7 electronic fuel injection. 2 x 50mm throttle bodies

Spark Plugs

Champion A59GC

Ignition

Inductive magnetically triggered

Battery

12V 16Ah

Starting

Electric

Max Power

85.3 kW / 116 hp @ 10500 rpm (at rear wheel: 80.1 kW / 109 hp @ 10500 rpm

Max Torque

80.4 Nm / 8.2 kgf-m / 59.3 ft-lb @ 8250 rpm

Clutch

Dry,multiplate

Transmission

6 Speed

Primary Drive Ratio

2:1 (31/62)
Gear Ratios 1st 2.466 / 2nd 1.765 / 3rd 1.400 / 4th 1.182 / 5th 1.043 / 6th 0.958:1

Final Drive Ratio

2.466:1 (15/37)

Final Drive

Chain

Frame

Tubular steel

Front Suspension

42 mm Öhlins FG 9050 upside-down fork with rebound compression damping adjustable

Rear Suspension

Öhlins DU 8070 single shock with preload and damping adjust

Front Brakes

2 x 320 mm Disc, 4 piston calipers

Rear Brakes

Single 245 mm disc, 2 piston caliper

Front Tyre

120/70 x 17

Rear Tyre

180/55 x 17

Dimensions

Length: 2000 mm / 78.7 in
Width:     670 mm / 26.4 in
Height:  1120 mm / 44.1 in

Wheelbase

1430 mm / 56.3 in

Seat Height

760 mm / 29.9 in

Dry Weight

188 kg / 414 lbs

Wet Weight

207 kg / 456 lbs

Fuel Capacity 

20 L / 5.3 US gal / 4.4 Imp gal

Consumption Average

5.6 L/100 km / 17.7 km/l / 41.6 US mpg / 50.0 Imp mpg
Standing ¼ Mile  10.8 sec / 204.5 km/h / 127.1 mph
Top Speed 250 km/h / 155 mph
Colours White frame, red
.  

Produced for the 1989 Italian Sport Production series that pitted production 750cc fours against twins of up to 1000cc, the first 851 Sport Production was virtually indistinguishable from the Strada. These machines were still 851cc, with 851 Superbike Kit updates, but a more serious homologation model appeared for 1990: the 851 SP2.

Although still titled an 851, the 851 SP2 displaced 888cc. There was a return to two injectors per cylinder, and the SP retained the H-section Pankl con-rods and 300-watt alternator. The transmission was the closer-ratio unit of the earlier 851 Superbike Kit, as were the camshafts. The valve sizes were 33 and 29mm, and the exhaust a 45mm Termignoni. Chassis improvements included an upside-down Öhlins front fork, Öhlins shock absorber, and fully floating Brembo cast-iron front disc brakes. The Öhlins fork was a high-quality unit, but it suffered from premature fork seal failure. There was an aluminum rear subframe. Although it was an expensive limited production model, the SP2 provided unparalleled handling and performance in 1990.

851 vs CBR600 vs FZR1000

Wherein we take a stab at one of life's eternal questions...

We wonder about things. We're journalists; it's our job. Things like the meaning of life. Why is there air? Why do wintergreen Life Savers spark when you bite 'em? What is Ellen Barkin's home phone number? And most important, once you strip away the hype, bluster and effluvia, what's the most effective quantity of high-performance sportsware? In a nutshell, what works where and why?

There are no easy answers. Beasties of all shapes and sizes display relative efficiency depending on what they're doing and where. And it was on this wonderfully nebulous note that the arguments...ahem...discussions started. Small, short ones and big, loud ones began raging through the ultimate repository of two-wheel wit and wisdom otherwise known as the Motorcyclist offices, lenatsch always starts it. Agility is everything, he says.

Hoist believes in horsepower, great shimmering mountains of it. After quietly chewing his pencil for a few minutes, Carrithers offers a one-word answer, "Money." And he adds, "The ticket to the top is neither big nor small, because against the fearsome visage of the American Express Platinum card, nothing may stand."

But everybody eventually tires of argument for Tylenol's sake and cuts to the chase to settle this once and for all. To satisfy the big-stick contingent, we brought back Yamaha's FZR1000 winner of our liter-class sport-bike shoot-out. Since the unfortunate demise of Yamaha's FZR400 at the small end of the spectrum, we chose Honda's CBR600F2, top dog in this year's 600 contest, to represent the less-is-more school. The dollars-uber-a//es approach was a tougher nut to crack. Bimota's Dieci bore too much family resemblance to the FZR. And we're lucky we stopped Carrithers before he charged World Superbike Champion Raymond Roche's practice bike to his expense account, settling for a slightly less exotic if more obtainable Ducati 851 S.P.2, commonly known as the 888. At $20,400, it certainly fills the bill.

Cubic inches, quick moves or cubic dollars? To get an empirical grip on the matter, we needed data. Lots of it. To that end, the matrix for settling our little-versus-large- conundrum is a balanced hexathlon of street and track tests designed to reveal the weaknesses of each entry without catering to the strengths of any. We gave double weight to real street riding, where most of us spend the vast majority of our time.

First, our three entries would butt heads for best time over "the fastest road in the West," better known as the nine-turn, 2.5-mile road course at Willow Springs. The contest would segue to the tighter turns of the adjacent 1.1-mile Streets of Willow. After that would come the obligatory dragstrip and top-speed testing, followed by repeated back-to-back runs down one fast, rough road and another smooth, tight one, routinely used for testing purposes. Dragstrip and top-speed sections would go strictly by the numbers. Three points for the best run at each, two for second and one for third. But our twisty-road testing requires some explanation.

Winning on the big track at Willow demands ridiculously high cornering speeds, and ridiculously high cornering speeds make stability vital as well as enough cornering clearance to get through the corners at mind-bending lean angles. You also need compliant suspension to keep the chassis calm while tracking bumps at warp speed through turns one, two and eight and constant communication with a trustworthy front end. The stopwatch will find a winner here; three points for fastest time, two for second and one for third. We took radar-gun speed readings at the apex of the 600-foot-radius turn nine to quantify each bike's cornering speed setting up for the all-important drive onto the three-eighth-mile-long straight. Big radar readings at the end of the straight before riders brake for turn one mean acceleration and horsepower. But they don't pay points. Only the watch does that. The quickest lap time wins.

A quick lap on the Streets of Willow takes agility, strong, controllable brakes and cooperative steering characteristics that allow braking deep into its way-late apex bends. Once cornering, you need a quick hit of controllable power and the traction to hook it up to squirt into the next bend. Smooth pavement makes compliant suspension less of a factor, but acceleration up the main straight through the kink is vital, so we stationed the radar gun there to see who was going fastest and then pointed the gun at the apex of turn three to find out who was cornering the quickest. But here again, points come only from the stopwatch.

Since stopwatches and radar guns have no business on the public roads, we relied on the finely tuned seats of our leather pants. Settling on two of our favorite roads (we could tell you where they are, but then we'd have to kill you), we spent a day twisting the throttles on three of the most enjoyable sport bikes in the world. Aside from being extremely fast, our fast road is bumpy as bloody hell. Well-sorted suspension, stability and almighty horsepower rule our road.

The tight road is more of an endless roller coaster of tight esses. Imagine never shifting out of second gear through a perpetual chicane of narrow, smooth, grippy pavement except to downshift for a few decreasing-radius, first-gear hairpins, and you'll get the idea. Quick, light steering, the ability to turn while braking and to squirt out of corners make the difference here.

After numerous back-to-back runs on each bike, we ranked the trio over both roads: three points for the favorite, two for first runner-up and one for third, then total the points for each road and rider.

THIRD PLACE: HONDA CBR600F2

After watching Miguel DuHamel and his CBR600 Su-persport machine scream around Daytona's banking, clicking off lap times that the majority of the 750cc Su-perbikes couldn't match, no one doubted the second-generation CBR would be serious competition for the big boys in this conflict. Sure, it spots them a few ponies, but its compact, 453-pound, 100-horsepower package would surely be tough to argue with.

The straight-line contests were all but a foregone conclusion, but the CBR's slick shape and the Ducati's short gearing ended in a 147-mph dead heat for second in the top-speed run, even if it did take the Honda twice the distance to do it. In the 440-yard sprint at LACR, the quick-revving CBR blew through the lights in 11.17 seconds at 122.3 mph, ranking it as the quickest 600 we've ever tested but cleanly out of the hunt against the big-bore Ducati and Yamaha. But that's just the straight-line stuff, and the light, oh-so-flickable Honda was sure to make up in the corners what it gave away in the straights. Or would it?

At first glance, the sweeping, high-speed turns of Willow Springs connected by a pair of long straights seem to scream for horsepower, but the locals know winning takes a lot more. The user-friendly 600s let the rider flick into the all-important 140-plus-mph turn eight flat out while the bigger, faster bikes often force the rider to back out of the throttle, usually scrubbing off too much speed in the process. And since getting out of the corners fast has a lot to do with getting down the straights fast, most 600s give the big-bike riders fits at Willow. But such wasn't the case this outing.

The CBR's front end has always been on the light side and somewhat vague in terms of feedback. This particular bike lacked the well-controlled damping of our original test unit, which didn't help matters. To top it off, the Michelin A59X and M59X radial tires got greasy after a handful of hard laps and never really hooked up after that. With the tires squirming on their tall tread blocks and the front suspension going numb when we needed traction information, our testers were unable to feel confident about the quick steering inputs and high entrance speeds needed to take full advantage of a middleweight's agility. The street-sensible ergonomics make little sense on the track; with the short-coupled seat-to-bar distance cramping them and the tall bars sitting them up in the wind, testers felt awkWard riding aggressively.

The final word from the stopwatch left the Honda a distant third, a full 1.61 seconds behind the Yamaha and 2.31 seconds in back of the ripping red Ducati. Given the time, we'd lower the front ride height by raising the fork legs in their triple clamps to load the front end, a trick that works wonders on other bikes. As we said earlier, the preload-only-adjustable front end was un-derdamped, and we ran the threaded adjusters down to the second to last mark to control dive. We were happiest with the rear shock's preload collar at number four of seven positions with the rebound damping near maximum, its adjuster backed out .25 of a possible 3.5 turns. We feel confident the lowered front end and a set of sticky track-compound tires would put the 600 squarely in the hunt, but that would be cheating.

When we moved to the 1.1-mile, nine-turn Streets of Willow course, the little CBR compared more favorably. Here agility and the ability to carry braking into turns reigns supreme, and those are the pink, blue and black bike's strong suits. In this point-and-shoot environment, the Honda was far and away the easiest to ride, despite the necessary, never-ending tap dance on the shift lever. The round profile of the front Michelin gave dead-neutral steering characteristics on the brakes or off, but the power-assisted feel to the brakes seemed to rob them of some feedback and made optimum modulation difficult. Once the peg feelers were removed, the tires ran out of traction before the bike ran out of cornering clearance; no one scraped anything. Through the transitions, its lightning-quick steering made the job effortless and immediate. The Honda stopped the clock .84 second quicker than the all-powerful Yamaha. Everything looked good until the ground-pounding Ducati, with its unlimited cornering clearance and superior torque and traction, rocketed from corner to corner to seize a .3-second advantage and top honors on the Streets.

The fast, bumpy terrain of our first road section had us running anywhere from second through fifth gears, and the little CBR felt noticeably short of breath in the San Gabriel Mountain's 4000-foot elevation. Testers found themselves hunting for another downshift and even then for more power out of the turns. The Honda's compliant suspension did the best job of the group of soaking up bumps in the turns, and at slightly lower street speeds, the limited tire traction was less of a concern. Still, the Honda found itself at the back of the pack once again because of the FZR's confidence-inspiring capability and the Duck's killer midrange rush. Once again our editors wished for a more committed sport-riding position, especially at higher speeds.

It was the never-ending, second-gear chicane of our second road section that made the CBR feel most at home. The lower speeds made the upright ergonomics more forgivable and the front-end feedback (or lack of it) less critical. And since the bigger bikes could only put so much power to the ground coming out of turns in the lower gears, the 600's power disadvantage was less pronounced. It was only after long deliberation and much head scratching that two of the three testers picked the FZR over the CBR and then by the narrowest of margins. Even then, most agreed the CBR would be a clear favorite on an unfamiliar road where its instantaneous midcorner correction capability would be invaluable.

So in the end we find that perhaps bigger—and to a certain extent, bigger bucks—is better. The Honda was let down by its underdamped, uncommunicative front end, imprecise tire-traction feedback (both related to cost) and street-biased ergonomics. The front end and tires are an easy fix, and the ergonomics better suit 90 percent of everyone's riding than that of the Yamaha and Ducati. But this wasn't a test of comfort, commuting or everyday use; it was a test of hardcore, no-excuses performance against a couple of the most competent bikes available, and in that light, bigger is better.

SECOND PLACE: DUCATI 851 SP2

Faces around the editorial table blanched at the thought. Take the bright red poseur 851 S.P.2 (more commonly known as the 888 in reference to its increased displacement) to the racetrack and compare it with a motorcycle that would kick ass (the FZR) and another that wouldn't be far behind (the CBR600).

The 888 would be a wild card, something racy to add variety to the test of two serious but more affordable sport bikes but without much chance of besting either in an all-around test of street and track performance. Sure, Ducati picked up last year's Superbike championship with Raymond Roche riding an 888, but, we thought, the resemblance between a production 888 and Roche's bike would be the difference between a Superbike-spec GSXR and a production bike. Not even $20,000 buys you that bike.

But $20,000 won't buy the 888 either. It's priced at $20,400, excluding taxes. For this test, the 888 was on the limit of the price envelope. From 10 yards the 888 is almost impossible to distinguish from Ducati's base 851. Only the knowledgeable will spot the external differences the limited-edition plate on the triple clamp, Öhlins fork, solo seat and the polished aluminum-alloy muffler cans give the game away.

Italian opera should sound this good. Starting the 888 is sheer mechanical euphoria. Emanating from the racetrack-legal mufflers came a sound like the lion's roar, a joyous cacophony of loose but meticulously assembled parts working in harmony, a sound hypnotic in its effect, with a devastating carry-through; out on the road even riders in front of the 888 could hear it from a hundred feet away. It's too loud for city limits, but urban riding is not the 888's forte.

The 888 is sold for "closed course competition only"; it's illegal on the street. But since the 888 comes with full lights, instruments and turn signals and figuring that Ducatisti will find ways to register their bikes, we decided to include a day's street riding in the comparison. Trust us, we're professionals.

The first day's riding impressions were at the racetrack. In the wide-open, horsepower-sapping environment of Willow Springs, the 888 feels almost slow, pulling out of corners strongly enough yet picking up revs slowly the rest of the way down the straights. Still, the Veglia tachometer can't keep pace with the 888's hot-rodded engine until fifth or sixth gear. Power peaks at around 9000 rpm.

The editors looked at the stopwatch figures in amazement, as the deceptive 888 ate up the turns on Willow's hard and fast corners. The result was a scorching 1:34.00-sec-ond lap that left the Honda and Yamaha gasping in awe.

The 888 outperformed both class winners on the Streets of Willow as well. It didn't look especially quick, it didn't feel fast and that lagging tachometer lied about the rpm, but the 888 with its superior grip and unlimited lean angle outpaced the opposition.

PERFORMANCE FIGURES
QUARTER-MILE* TOP SPEED WILLOW SPRINGS LAP TIMES STREETS OF WILLOW LAP TIMES
851 SP2 12 sec/128.0 mph 147 mph 1:34.00 sec. 1:04.02 sec.
CBR600F2 12 sec/122.3 mph 147 mph 1:36.31 sec. 1:04,32 sec.
FZR 1000 12 sec/131.0 mph 166 mph 1:34.70 sec 1:05.16 sec.

Throttle control is linear and precise. The engine pulls away cleanly even on full throttle at any speed, and once in the powerband, above 6000 rpm, opening the throttle to any setting reaches precisely that power level. On the street, the fuel injection is a mite too sensitive, so a tiny change in wrist attitude over bumps surges the bike forward.

The close-ratio six-speed gearbox is set up perfectly for Willow Springs' fast curves, just reaching redline in sixth gear at the shutoff point before turn one. Brakes worked well on the big track where riders haul down hard only in turns one and three. After a few laps of the Streets of Willow, which demand fierce braking around tight, twisty corners, the Ducati's Brembos showed signs of strain and faded noticeably. On the street the brakes heated up and got mushier than the Yamaha's linear stoppers but gave more feedback than the CBR's instant-on brakes.

Ground Clearance is unlimited at the track or on the street. As much as we tried to, we couldn't touch down a thing. The high center of mass contributed to the feeling testers had of being too high off the ground, ready to tip over the front wheel especially compared to the low-slung Yamaha. Suspension lost the 888 a first place in this equivocal contest. The Öhlins male-slider fork and fully adjustable rear shock may look like the equipment off a front-line AMA Su-perbike, but the spring and damping rates are off the charts. Dialing the front to absolute minimum preload and compression damping and full max on rebound left the Duck feeling ridiculously harsh over bumps and needing yet more rebound damping. At the rear, compression damping was hopelessly high even at the minimum setting. The 888 retained classic Italian stiffness, resisting potholes and road shocks badly enough to jar the rider off line. Yet through all this punishment the chassis remained stable and secure, so those times when the rider found himself still in the seat, he was in control. The seat is tapered away from the center, which hinders street comfort but helps rapid body transitions on the racetrack.

Stock Michelin Hi-Sport radials were outstanding on the track, giving substantially more traction than the others in the test and hooking up perfectly even with the throttle twisted hard exiting the corners. But these sticky tires abrade quickly. After a day of track use the rear radial had zero tread on the right side, and the next day's street riding did in the rest, although the tire continued to work well. Replacement cost is $183.97 for the Michelin TX11 rear and $117.95 for the TX22 front, which should outlast two rears.

APEX AND STRAIGHTAWAY SPEEDS

WILLOW SPRINGS STREETS OF WILLOW
TURN NINE APEX END OF FRONT STRAIGHT TURN THREE APEX END OF FRONT STRAIGHT
851 SP2 84 mph 136 mph 45 mph 104 mph
CBR600F2 89 mph 129 mph 44 mph 99 mph
FZR1000 86 mph 144 mph 43 mph 107 mph

Quarter-mile times were expected to suffer with such a close-ratio gearset; again, the 888 confounded. Tractorlike, it planted its rear tire and plowed its way up the track to a 10.72-second, 128.0-mph pass, a tick behind the Yamaha but still fast enough to beat any 750 sport bike.

Our test machine had already been used hard, and it was starting to show. Fork seals were replaced before our test but gave no problems during it. A water-pump hose fitting allowed a few drops of coolant to spray onto the rider's left boot during the track sessions.

On the move, gearshifting was a delight. The close-ratio gearbox needed the merest click between gears, allowing the revs to rise or fall just a few hundred rpm. Shifting came, in the opinion of one tester, as close to perfect as he'd ever felt. At low speeds or while stationary finding neutral is difficult to impossible; usually it is easier to kill the motor, find neutral and restart. But then this confrontation wasn't about low speeds, and the 888 acquitted itself admirably—assuming that spending upwards of 20 Gs doesn't faze you and its away-from-the-mainstream character entices you.

FIRST PLACE: YAMAHA FZR1000

Whack open the throttle of Yamaha's FZR1000, and you'll know why the bike came to this party and took the cake. It hauls ass. And it does said hauling without scaring the wits just of the loose nut behind the handlebars. Even at 533 pounds, 80 more than the Honda and 69 more than the Ducati, the Yamaha stops, turns and leaves better than Honda's or Ducati's best.

Few doubted the outcome of the straight-line tests: the FZR dominated. Out on the desert, the biggest of the three contestants slammed through the atmosphere at 166 radar-gun-measured mph, indicating 11,400 rpm on the tach, just 100 rpm under redline and burying the optimistic speedometer. Yamaha's redesigned bodywork includes a slicker fairing this year that makes the most of what the Genesis 20-valve power plant churns out. The same engine won at Los Angeles County Raceway, tripping the timing lights only 10.54 seconds after leaving the smoldering starting line, running to 131.0 mph in the top of fourth gear. Despite an abrupt hydraulic clutch, the Genesis engine feels right at home on the quarter-mile, shifting quickly and surely every run. The Pirelli MP7S ra-dials make excellent strip tires once warmed, though we ran the rear tire pressure at 22 pounds to enlarge the contact patch.

But at Willow Springs and on the Streets of Willow the Yamaha relinquished its advantage, since pure power won't win you a roadracing trophy. The FZR acquitted itself well, but this competition doesn't reward merely competent performance.

The big Yamaha needs more Ground Clearance, pure and simple. Flick it in hard and the pegs drag, grinding the toes off your boots in short order. Persist in right-handers, and the unyielding exhaust muffler touches down. The MP7S radials are ready for almost anything, but Yamaha needs to get the hard parts off the ground to take advantage of these tires. The problem was most noticeable on the big track because the long, fast sweepers encourage deep lean angles, massive cornering forces on the suspension and more speed. The chassis and suspension keep the bike stable and pointed in the desired direction, but even after we increased the rear-shock preload in an effort to gain Ground Clearance, the Yamaha couldn't answer the Ducati's challenge despite generating considerably higher straightaway speeds.

Getting the FZR stopped and turned emphasizes the weight of the bike, but thanks to remarkably strong and consistent brakes (320mm front rotors with four-pot Tokico calipers in front) the Yamaha could rush into corners deep enough to make some purpose-built race bikes jealous. Despite a lack of rebound- and compression-damping adjustments on the front fork, Yamaha's fork-damping choices offer excellent wheel control and provide the rider with an exact idea of what the front end is doing; the Yamaha male-slider front end is the most precise in this test.

While the FZR lost its stranglehold on first place during the racetrack comparison, the Genesis-powered machine climbed to a secure lead during the street-riding section. In the point-and-shoot world of street riding, nothing felt as right as Yamaha's biggest FZR. Unequaled front-end feel leads the highlight list, allowing the rider to bank the bike through corners with confidence in front-tire traction; the relatively heavy steering couldn't match the quick turning of the CBR and midcorner surprises took more muscle to deal with, but the calm, unruffled performance of the Kayaba put the FZR in front. Most riders felt the fork's compression damping was a bit stiff, but nothing like the 888's severe front end.

The weight of the FZR also came into play on the street, especially during tricky downhill corners that required braking all the way to the apex. The Yamaha didn't like running in hard on the brakes while turning; when we separated the two actions (got our braking done early), the FZR turned in eagerly and without a fight. The Deltabox frame and swingarm worked as wonderfully on the street as at Willow Springs, never hinting at a wallow or wiggle, even over rough pavement in Willow's ridiculously fast turn eight.

Riding an FZR1000 quickly takes plenty of muscle at the stubby clip-ons. Not only is the bike heavy and long (57.9-inch wheelbase), but the handlebars don't provide much leverage to turn the bike up on the wide wheels. The Pirelli radials help here; their triangulated profiles encourage responsiveness from an otherwise conservative chassis. This bike is quite susceptible to tire profile, so choose replacement tires wisely or you may create an even heavier-steering machine. Shifting your weight to the inside helps the bike turn and is a boon during quick transitions at good speed; you'll be well-versed in the art of countersteering after a fast ride on the biggest FZR.

Standout flaws are few and hard to spot. The bike needs more cornering clearance, lighter compression damping in the fork (or damping adjustments) and a diet. On the plus side is a long list of what a sport bike must do to be successful, starting with an exemplary feel at the handlebars that does much for rider confidence. The hell-strong 20-valve engine doesn't hurt either, especially when back-stopped with some of the best brakes in the business. In 1991, nobody builds a more capable big-bore sport bike than Yamaha.

 Source MOTORCYCLIST