|
Classic Bikes
Custom Bikes
Individual
Racing Bikes AJP
AJS
Aprilia
Ariel
Avinton / Wakan
Bajaj
Benelli
Beta
Bimota
BMW
Brough Superior
BRP Cam-Am
BSA
Buell / EBR
Bultaco
Cagiva
Campagna
CCM
CF Moto
Combat Motors
Derbi
Deus
Ducati
Excelsior
GASGAS
Ghezzi Brian
Gilera
GIMA
Harley Davidson
Hero
Highland
Honda
Horex
Husaberg
Husqvarna
Hyosung
Indian
Jawa
Kawasaki
KTM
KYMCO
Laverda
Lazareth
Magni
Maico
Mash
Matchless
Mondial
Moto Guzzi
Moto Morini
MV Agusta
MZ / MuZ
NCR
Norton
NSU
Paton
Peugeot
Piaggio
Revival Cycles
Roland Sands
Royal Enfield
Sachs
Sherco
Sunbeam
Suzuki
SWM
SYM
Triumph
TVS
Ural
Velocette
Vespa
Victory
Vincent
VOR
Voxan
Vyrus
Walt Siegl
Walz
Wrenchmonkees
Wunderlich
XTR / Radical
Yamaha
Zero
Video
Technical
Complete Manufacturer List
|
Harley Davidson FLHTC 1340 Electra Glide Classic
Review Need the biggest touring bike on the
block? Climb aboard the Electra Glide Classic—but you'd better have a thick
wallet too. For about $11 a pound, the FLHT owner gets a big touring motorcycle, 781.5 pounds wet, with accommodations for two, their gear, and accessories. Big touring motorcycles are heavy (Honda's Aspencade is 766 pounds). To be roomy enough for rider, passenger and accessories, these machines have to be big, and an FLHT can't be this big without being heavy. The FLHT can handle a 400-pound payload. Even after counting in fairing, saddlebags, King Tour Pak and so on, a tubby rider and passenger would have 75 pounds available for luggage and gear. That's impressive. If you can't manage a tour on 75 to95 pounds,you'd better try motorhoming. The FLHT running gear is a variant of that found on the FXRS. The FLHT steering head is quite different, since the T-series motorcycles use Harley-Davidson's reversed triple clamps, which position the fork tubes behind the steering pivot when the front wheel points dead ahead. The FLHT fork, however, appears Harley-Tradi-tional. The object of the assembly was to lighten the force the old FLH-series motorcycles required at the bars. Motorcycles that weigh over 900 pounds on the road, that have long (62-inch) wheelbases, and that carry 90/16 front tires, demand truck-driver muscles. Even with its reversed triple clamps, the FLHT still calls for manly effort at very low speeds. Those accustomed to Japanese motorcycles
will find other maneuvers awkWard. At rest, the rider's feet get planted on
the pavement between the footboards and passenger pegs. Since heavy machines
encourage a rider to delay lifting his feet, occasionally our staffers would
scrape the backside of their legs on the passenger pegs. To use the rear
brake the rider must pull his foot off the floorboard to reach the pedal.
Again, for our staffers, that's an unnatural move. The shift lever, however,
can be worked with the left foot on the board. The engine, handlebar and floorboards are
rubber-mounted, and the seat is foam deep in rubber. Despite the insulation,
the rider can notice upper end engine noise and the passenger will feel the
footpegs vibrate. For non-adjustable units, the front and rear suspension
components work very well on the interstate, the place for which they're
calibrated. The FLHT gives its riders lots of lights, not all of them on the instrument panel. Both fenders have running lights, as do the Tour Pak and saddlebags. Twin spots complement the single headlamp. The FLHT can be seen and its rider will never lack candlepower for the road ahead. Packing space is likewise no problem. The King Tour Pak is a good place for light, bulky items because the recommended weight rating is 25 pounds; the saddlebags offer space to balance out loads at a recommended 15 pounds per side. Bags and Tour Pak mount on the bike with QD Dzus fasteners. In order to remove Pak or bags, the rider may have to shuffle through or remove the contents to unfasten the carriers, and then unplug the light lines. The bags must be removed to adjust shock spring preload. Both bags and Pak sealed perfectly in a day-long downpour. The ignition may be operated keyless, though it takes the key to lock the fork. The lid to the gas-cap compartment is also key-operated; thus it's possible to ride off without keys, as long as your trip doesn't exceed your gas supply. The range is about 130 miles. The FLHT's average fuel consumption was, at 31.5 mpg, surprising since the FXRS (tested January 1981) has the same engine and returned an average near 50 mpg. But the FXRS is lighter and doesn't push a large fairing around.' Though the Harley-Davidson front brake improved with mileage, by contemporary standards the brakes reached an unimpressive level at best. The hand-lever requires substantial pressure, and even a gorilla grip yields barely mediocre retardation. Big touring bikes rolling 900-odd pounds down the highway need absolutely first-class brakes; in many ways touring heavyweights test brakes more severely than smaller, lighter sport motorcycles chased pell-mell into corners. Back-road friskiness is best avoided on the FLHT— and, for that matter, on any big touring rig, though the H-D's non-adjustable suspension underscores this point. Suspension, ground clearance and weight all work mightily against such behavior. The FLHT is a very expensive motorcycle in a class of very expensive motorcycles. What makes all these motorcycles doubly costly is their one-dimensional nature, dictated by size, weight and comportment. As a class, big touring bikes lack versatility; they're fun only on open highways as ultimate, two-wheeled convertibles. In this respect, the FLHT is a good example of the genre: one full day in the saddle shows a rider both the strengths and weaknesses of big, heavy touring motorcycles. Presumably, Milwaukee believes there's little room for further development and elaboration of the FLH/FLHT concept. Elaboration such as multi-function communication centers and infinitely adjustable suspension would only make such bikes more expensive absolutely, and more expensive relative to, for example, the American-assembled Gold Wing Aspencade. Maybe Harley's recent introduction of the FXRT suggests that decision-makers in Milwaukee think lighter, more nimble touring motorcycles hold greater future promise for Harley-Davidson. With that, we'd agree. ■ Source Cycle 1983
|
|
Any corrections or more information on these motorcycles will be kindly appreciated. |