MV Agusta 350 Sport Ipotesi

The 350 “Ipotesi” model was unveiled at the Milan Motorshow in 1973. It looked like a pure exercise in style, which was destined to attract attention mainly for its line and the peculiarity of other aesthetic features, and it seemed inevitable that it would require a series of modifications. The design originated from the pencil of one of the most important Italian industrial designers, Giorgio Giugiaro. But the motorcycle went into regular production in its original form between 1974 and 1977. The basic engine was that mounted on the 350S, but it was modified in the design to better suit the daring new aesthetics characterized by straight lines. The carters and cylinder block had a squared shape and the frame was also modified as its upper tubes formed a flat surface, which ran from the handlebars to the rear suspensions that followed the outline of the fuel tank. The wheels were in light alloy from an MV Agusta design. The motorcycle enjoyed a good deal of success but the decision to stop the production meant that it did not have the commercial recognition it deserved.

Review

MV's concept of a sports single is robustly efficient — but does the name make up for the bike and its price?

"OKAY, SO YOU'RE RIDING an MY 350 —and MY do win the 350 world championship, but the bike you paid $1200 for has a frame like a prewar Velocette and a motor that looks like a split single Jawa two-stroke."

In a way he was correct; the makers do stick their rectangular badge on top of the tank boasting the number of world championships they have won. It may be all right for the glamorous 750 but it is completely out of place on this 350 — a bike as far removed from the modern racing bike design as it is possible to imagine.

The basic machine was designed in the early fifties and apart from the brakes, suspension and pretty trimmings, is unchanged. The motor looks mid-fiftyish and resembles the old Jawa, just as the observer said. The seat, tank and front end look attractive but they do little to alter the basic image. But the fact is that the motor is sufficiently powerful

and durable enough to last for many years to come, and the frame is certainty stiff enough.

Such is the MY 350; it is a well-buiit little middleweight with racey lines around an old design that will set you back a cool $1200.

We picked up the bike from Bob Jane's new Footscray shop in Melbourne, and took it straight out on the nearby Geelong Road which is a fast multi-laned highway.

Like the 750, the riding position is strictly racing — but a good racing one for the hand and foot controls are perfectly located. The few miles through the suburbs confirmed what anyone can expect from rearsets and clip-ons — fun for the first few minutes followed by a gradual feeling of discomfort.

Mixing it with the fast-moving, inter-city, highway traffic lifted the weight from the wrists and the 70 mph ride became enjoyable. At this speed a fair amount of vibration can be felt through the pegs and bars. It won't worry riders, but it murdered the little CEV instruments. They're the size of 20 cent pieces, and their lack of accuracy is laughable. Not only are they plus or minus accurate readings at any time (as our speed trap proved later) but they are slow to react.

At the end of the morning with more than 100 miles of city and highway riding completed we arrived at Calder Raceway to run performance figures.

Revving the engine to eight grand produces lively acceleration through the close-ratio gears. Down the long straight and into Repco corner the braking was left quite late — a mistake not to be repeated!

The front stopper is a grabber of the first order when the lever is pulled hard. There is not a trace of progression, just one almighty dig-in of the front tyre as the forks slam down to full movement. Presumably the only way to cure this (although we didn't get the opportunity to prove it) would be to taper the leading edges of the brake linings.

Leaning it deep into Repco showed the clearance to be good and the quick burst up through the gears along the back straight soon brought us into the esses. After taking the righthander and making a short bit

oi' acceleration for the next bend the throttle could just be closed to utilise surprisingiy good braking effect from the engine.

Throwing the bike down into the only left hander of the circuit caused one almighty scrape from the centre stand, causing involuntary straightening up which put the bike wet! off on the right hand side of the track for Gtoweave corner. It needed a full track wide S movement to approach the next right hand bend from the correct angle.

Down the main straight again and on to the second lap, where a rider could rest the front part of his bucket helmet on the tank cap to achieve the excellent streamlining this 350 offers. We soon forgot the clutch and going up and down the box merely became a few short but firm prods on the lever to maintain the revs between six and eight thousand. Under these conditions the bike returns just under 50 mpg and even after many laps no oil could be seen from any of the engine joints.

Though the machine lapped the circuit quite fast for a 350 it did so only because of its tight weight. The actual pick-up is quite sluggish by modern standards and it takes some time before the full 28 horses can be used to their full advantage through the 300 pound bike.

We are surprised just how stiff the frame is, but the makers could have obtained the same amount of rigidity by using modern double loop, small diameter, light wall tubing in a triangulated layout. The result would be a substantial weight saving as well as looking a bit more contemporary than the existing configuration.

Admittedly a single front tube looks alright but the huge swinging arm mounting plates and those large unsightly bo omerang-cum-banana oval tubes up to the top of the units are not really acceptable nowadays.

Source Two Wheels October 1972